Friday, October 12

The Friday Random Ten+5 is taking it one day at a time.

As you've no doubt guessed from this blog, I'm still recovering from the hellacious beatdown Tennessee laid on my Bulldogs in Knoxville last week. But everybody's got their own way of recovering, and I've got mine. After a catastrophe like that, you've got to get through the five stages of grief one way or another, and this week's +5 discusses how I've made that particular journey: The Five Stages Of Dealing With A Humiliating Loss And How I Accomplish Them.



First stage: Denial
Stolichnaya vodka

This, of course, is the part where you try to deny that the embarrassing blowout is even happening. But some losses are easier to deny than others. "Brandon Cox didn't really just toss a 64-yard pass on fourth-and-10 to set Auburn up for the winning field goal," for instance, is a snap, but when your guys are down 28-0 at halftime to a team they should be rolling against, erasing that reality is going to require more than simply closing your eyes and reciting affirmations. Nope, you're gonna need to completely rearrange your consciousness, and nobody has perfected the art of escaping soul-crushing misery through alcohol like the Russians. You'll want to keep at least a fifth handy at all times, but the 1.75-liter handle bottle is even better. Don't get hung up on mixers, either. Orange juice? Look, if I wanted a fruit salad, I would've made myself a fruit salad.



Second stage: Anger
Wolfenstein 3D

Now you're just taking your rage out on others, and when it comes to that, you can keep your fancy-ass XBoxes or "Doom 3" games -- give me a PC, 1992-vintage pixellated graphics, and mowing Nazis down with a Gatling gun. "Wolfenstein" basically pioneered the first-person-shooter genre of video games, and yes, you can still download it from any number of places on the Internet. And it makes for a richly satisfying way of venting your anger without actually killing anyone. Plus the people you're pumping full of lead are just Nazis, so you don't even feel guilty for being a sicko when you're done.



Third stafe: Bargaining
Boston terrier (or other pet)

Now you've started to recognize your powerlessness over the situation, and you're trying to make deals with God to keep such a miserable blowout from happening again. Some people in this situation would promise to be nicer people or treat their kids better, but I don't have any kids and being nice to other people is still a bit of a stretch for me, so I choose to seek validation and acceptance from my dog. Even if the football gods have abandoned you, a dog never will.



Fourth stage: Depression
Ruby Minis

Here's the part where you give into the temptation to sulk and be miserable. You need comfort food, and there are not many better choices out there than the little cheeseburgers they started offering at Ruby Tuesday a while back. When I describe these to people who are unfamiliar with the concept, they almost always say something like, "Oh, like Krystals?" No, they're nothing like Krystals -- they're basically shrunk-down versions of the full-size burgers Ruby Tuesday makes, and they have pickles and little fried-onion straws on them, and they are just the thing when you've given up hope and are looking to find solace in food. Actually, they're good for plenty of other situations as well, but bear with me here. (Also good: chicken fingers from Zaxby's or Guthrie's.)



Fifth stage: Acceptance
Hooters

Eventually, you come to the grips with the fact that your team has received a 3-TD firebombing from a hated rival, you realize that the sun is still coming up and they still have another game the very next week, and you determine that your misery over one game isn't enough to overcome your football addiction. So you dust yourself off and make plans to watch the next game. You're still tender from being kicked in the crotch the previous week, though, so you can't take a full dose of pure, undiluted sports just yet; you need to ease back in and cut it with something else. Like chicken wings and boobs.

And now you're ready to go. Excelsior!

The Ten:

1. David Holmes, "Freaknik"
2. Sting, "Jeremiah Blues (Part 1)"
3. Aphex Twin, "Girl/Boy Song"
4. The Love Unlimited Orchestra, "Love's Theme"
5. Dave Attell, "Sex Store"
6. Pet Shop Boys, "The Man Who Has Everything" (Hypnotizer remix)
7. Big Audio Dynamite II, "In My Dreams"
8. Elvis Costello, "Radio, Radio"
9. A Tribe Called Quest, "Mind Power"
10. Dean Martin, "He's Got You"

Your own Tens and/or methods for dealing with loss, even if it's just something minor like death or divorce, are welcome in the comments.

Thursday, October 11

Thursday Mystery Meat is not a cheer-ocracy.

• Earlier this week I related a woeful tale of cockblocking that "begs to have a country song written about it." On Thursday, my homey, my ace, my slice, my ace boon coon T. Kyle King wrote the song.

A homeless lady cramped my style
And it hurt too much to laugh.
I couldn't get untracked; I was down
By four touchdowns at the half.

I couldn't win for losing.
I lost my shot with a beauty queen.
It never crossed my mind that I'd fall so far behind
And lose 35-14.


Ah, it feels good to laugh again. My sister said she tried to write such a song herself -- "AIDS Walk Cock Block," to the tune of "Honky Tonk Badonkadonk" -- but couldn't make it work.

• Earlier this month NFL commissioner Roger Goodell restricted the areas where cheerleaders are allowed to do their warmup stretching, saying that the girls are a distraction to the players. Which sounded stupid to me, but apparently Michael Strahan -- who's had the opportunity to ogle plenty of cheerleaders over the course of a 15-year career -- says Goodell might be on to something:

"The cheerleaders are a huge, huge distraction," he writes. "They aren't there just to distract the fans, they're used as a weapon against us, too. We stare at cheerleaders sometimes. It's against the rules for a cheerleader to date a player, but it happens all the time."


And whose cheerleaders are the most distracting? Not the Dallas Cowboys', not the San Diego Chargers' (Hey Jenny Slater's official Most Underrated Cheerleaders of the NFL), but my very own Washington Redskins':

"I'll tell you the best girls in the league, by far, are not the famous Dallas Cowboys cheerleaders or the famed Raiderettes. It's not even close, folks. The Washington Redskins get the prize in my book. Every single one of those girls is stunning."





At this point, I'm pretty much proceeding under the assumption that nobody's actually reading any of this. Poop! Monkey butt!

• Speaking of cheerleaders, it's time for a Cheerleader Curse Update: After the power of the curse sent previously undefeated Oklahoma to a stunning upset loss to Colorado, the curse took a week off -- the next Cheerleader of the Week, Kelsi Metzler of Oregon, didn't have anything to do on Saturday except sit around, do her nails, and enjoy the Ducks' bye week (oh, and possibly revel in USC's loss to Stanford). This week, Oregon hosts Washington State, so we'll get to see if the Cheerleader Curse has hangover effects that can last through a bye. Even if they don't, this week's CotW is Holly Donaldson of North Carolina, so expect the Tarheels to get smacked by the Gamecocks on Saturday.


About to get 'Cock-blocked too, only in a completely different way.

• On that note, this week's SEC predictions are up over at Fleabomb.com. I'm predicting a 31-16 South Carolina win, FYI.

• As for North Carolina's ACC stablemate Georgia Tech, somehow I completely missed the fact that they're going up against Miami (and their former offensive coordinator, Patrick Nix) this weekend. But apparently I wasn't the only one.

• Hey, remember a few months ago when I expressed concern that Victoria Beckham was not a human at all but rather "some advanced humanoid that was grown in a lab"?



Well, I may have whiffed on warning you guys about her superhumanly strong titanium nipples, but I think the rest of it I pretty much nailed.

Tuesday, October 9

Fate: Just another word for the spot where "opportunity" and "humiliation" collide.



This story is apropos of nothing, really, but I just thought you might be interested in what typically happens when something cool almost happens to me with respect to the opposite sex; it kind of makes a companion piece to the almost-cool-but-not-really Jenna Bush story from this past spring.


Fig. 1: Magic City AIDS Walk.

My neighbor Katie and I walked a couple blocks to Brother Bryan Park this past Sunday to go to the Magic City AIDS Walk, just to see what was going on, check out the drag queens, maybe donate a little money. I brought Jenna with me, and as we were walking around we spotted the recently elected Miss Birmingham signing autographs. Jenna ran right over to her, and Miss Birmingham immediately said "What a cute dog!" and started playing with her. And I'm thinking, yes, it's good to have a dog.


Fig. 2: Miss Birmingham.

Now, I should probably also mention that Brother Bryan Park after hours is a rather popular hangout for homeless people and the like, and more than a few of them were hanging around during the AIDS Walk festivities. One of them was a woman I see pretty frequently as I'm taking Jenna for a walk around Five Points. I don't want to be gratuitously cruel here, because this woman's never done anything wrong to me, but she's a little loopy, her face is a bit messed up, her teeth look like what would happen if you looked in every mouth in the British Isles and selected the 32 worst teeth you could find . . . basically, I'm 99-percent sure that she's not a Southern Baptist but rather a Crystal Methodist. But again, she's never done anything wrong to me, and she loves Jenna, as most people do.

So I'm standing there with Miss Birmingham as she's fussing over Jenna, trying to figure out the best way to get some kind of conversation started, when I hear a raspy voice holler "JENNA!!!" and who should walk over but . . . yup, the homeless lady. She scoops Jenna up and starts playing with her. Record skips, heads turn, moment killed. Brutally murdered, in fact.

So that's pretty much how it goes when you're me. Given an obvious opportunity, something always intervenes, and this time it wasn't even my own stupidity and/or social ineptness -- it was a homeless person cock-blocking me in front of Miss Birmingham.


Fig. 3: A referee signals an illegal cock block, which awards the blockee fifteen yards and an automatic first down.

Humiliated by Tennessee on Saturday, cock-blocked by a methhead on Sunday. The kind of weekend that just begs to have a country song written about it.

BlogPoll ballot #7: I got 99 problems, but Georgia bein' in the top 25 ain't one.

Before any of this week’s BlogPoll festivities get started, I want to proclaim it from the highest rooftops: No, there is no fucking way Georgia should be ranked ahead of Tennessee in either the AP or coaches’ polls this week. The fact that Georgia is even ranked period at this point is proof that none of the voting sportswriters or coaches watched a single minute of that game.

And this from a guy who would rather listen to Michael Bolton CDs at the bottom of a well-used Port-O-Let on a hot summer day than say anything nice about Tennessee.

So anyway, please excuse this week’s ballot. My mental state is not stable at the moment.

Games watched: Memphis-Marshall, the first half of Auburn-Vanderbilt (listened to on the radio), the second half of Georgia-Georgia Tech, the Tennessee-Georgia debacle, parts of Florida State-N.C. State, the second half of LSU-Florida.

1. LSU (last week: 1)
Yeah, yeah, I know, if any of those five fourth-down conversions goes awry we may be sitting here talking about what a dumbass Les Miles is. But he’s a great coach if for no other reason than because he had confidence in his players to make those plays, and I can’t think of any better motivational technique than to tell your players, “Yes, you can do this, and you will.” Kind of makes me wish we had more of that on Georgia’s sideline these days.

2. Ohio State (4)

3. California (3)

4. Boston College (5)

5. Oklahoma (8)

6. South Florida (7)

7. South Carolina (9)

8. Oregon (12)
Up four spots this week for doing nothing — mainly because of two things: One, I feel like I hit them too hard last week for what was really an extremely competitive loss to a great Cal team, and two, there’s no way I can put them below Southern Cal at this point. Actually, make that three things: Kelsi Metzler, SI.com’s Cheerleader of the Week, is off-the-charts hot — are you happy now, Andy? — but of course that only means the Ducks are going to get klonged when they play Washington State this week.

9. Florida (13)
Up four spots? After losing to LSU? I have to cut them some slack — they put on a truly inspired performance and would’ve had a stirring bounce-back victory in one of college football’s toughest venues had it not been for Les Miles’s gigantic, chrome-plated testicles.

10. Southern California (2)
I kind of feel like I should drop them even more slots than this, because they lost to Stanford the same way they nearly lost to Washington the week before: turnovers, inconsistent QB play, and a bunch of penalties. As Ian Fleming once said, “Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action”; if they pull the same stuff against Arizona next week, they could drop further, even if they end up winning the thing.

11. West Virginia (10)

12. Missouri (19)

13. Auburn (16)

14. Arizona State (11)

15. Kentucky (14)
South Carolina showed that a good defensive performance can throw this team off track, but it’s worth noting that they needed some big defensive plays to do it, and even then, the Wildcats managed to roll up 384 yards. Hence the drop of only one slot this week.

16. Tennessee (NR/27)
Last week I caught some heat for only dropping Oklahoma a few slots in the wake of their stunning loss to Colorado (and for not ranking Colorado at all) because OU did lead 24-7 at one point, after all, and the whole thing seemed “fluky.” Apparently the nation’s poll voters think Tennessee’s win over Georgia was “fluky,” too, because UGA is still ranked ahead of UT in the AP poll (24 vs. 25), whereas in the coaches’ poll, Georgia is still hanging in there at 23 while Tennessee is still in the “others receiving votes” category. WTF?!? Guys, since you obviously didn’t see that game, let me clue you in: There is a difference between “coughing up a 24-7 lead” and “never having a lead to begin with.” Oklahoma waited until the fourth quarter to get caught napping; Georgia was asleep from the opening kickoff and remained that way for the duration of the game. To call Georgia one of the 25 best teams in the country is a damn-near-unforgivable insult to at least 95 others.

17. Illinois (22)

18. Cincinnati (NR/28)

19. Hawaii (23)

20. Arkansas (24)
Things get a little wonky around here — Arkansas up four despite sleepwalking through a game against a who-cares opponent, Texas down only two, Michigan down five after a win — so all I can say is that if these teams had to face each other in the hypothetical neutral-field situation, this is how I think things would shake out. And after a week in which Stanford knocked off Southern Cal in Los Angeles, who are you to judge me?!?!

21. Virginia Tech (21)

22. Texas (20)

23. Michigan (18)

24. Kansas (NR)

25. Wisconsin (6)

The next five: Boise State, Texas Tech, Penn State, Georgia, Maryland.

Dropped out: Georgia (15), Rutgers (17), Penn State (25).

Sunday, October 7

Who issued the instruction for this mad act of destruction?

Lots to tear my hair out about this morning, but before I get to that, I have some helmet stickers to give out: Thank you, Southern Cal. Merci beaucoup, Wisconsin. ﺷﻜﺮﺁ, UCLA. Because of your high-profile implosions on Saturday, the national media is all but completely ignoring what was easily the most wretched game the Bulldogs have played -- or coached -- during the Mark Richt era.


"Oh . . . uh, you're welcome, I guess."

The passing game was, with a few isolated exceptions, every bit as out-of-sync as it was during the worst moments of the South Carolina game. The rushing attack was a mere shadow of the one that had been talked up for weeks as Georgia's major strength. The defense could barely get into the proper position half the time, and even when they did, they "tackled" with an indifference I've not seen since the Jim Donnan years. The entire team looked like they were either recovering from New Year's-grade hangovers or attempting to run through mud that, strangely, Tennessee's players managed to avoid. Brian Mimbs was a beast at the punting position (yes, that was intended to sound ridiculous), and Demiko Goodman made an awesome catch to take away the shutout early in the third quarter, but otherwise, everything about this team, in every phase of the game, sucked. It was a Jim Mora "diddly-poo" speech waiting to happen.



Except it never did.

I watched the game in Atlanta with a bunch of the Tent City tailgating crew as part of poor Scotty Hartman's 30th birthday festivities, and I was able to listen to most of Mark Richt's postgame press conference as I made the long walk drive of shame back to the Salty 'Ham. I did not hear anyone yell, scream, or curse at that presser, which came as no surprise; I think anything short of Katharyn Richt getting bludgeoned to death by an al-Qaeda assassin in her own kitchen would elicit little more than a scowl on the face of our Fearless Leader, and to some extent that's been a boon for our program and our players. But to some extent it's also been a hindrance -- as I've alluded to before in this space -- and never has that been the case more than it was on Saturday. Some of the statements Richt made I had to grudgingly concede were true, but others -- such as the following quote, recounted with no small amount of incredulity by by Jeff Schultz in his dumbfounded column in Sunday's AJC -- made me wonder what a toaster oven would look like if it was hurled out the window of a Volkswagen Jetta traveling through downtown Atlanta at about 85 mph:

“It’s not that surprising to see Tennessee’s D-line handle our guys like that,” coach Mark Richt said Saturday.


Mark, you keep using that word, "surprising" -- I do not think that word means what you think it means.



Was it inconceivable that Tennessee's D-line would handle us like that? Certainly not. This is the SEC, after all, and even a subpar defense by SEC standards -- which, coming into this game, Tennessee's most certainly was -- usually still has enough raw talent to jump up and sock somebody in the mouth on any given day. If you did not find their domination of our offense surprising, however, then sir, you have truly lived a rich and exciting life. Here we had a Tennessee defense that, up until today, had appeared little more than passive spectators in relation to the offenses they faced, yet against the best Darren McFadden-less rushing attack in the league, they looked like the New England Patriots.

That isn't surprising to you? Not even a little bit? Look, we can even throw out the games Tennessee played against great teams like Cal and Florida. Southern Miss's offense managed not to get rolled by Tennessee; the Golden Eagles were down by only one at halftime. Arkansas State's offense managed to hang with the Vols, in Knoxville, into the fourth quarter. Yet Georgia, with a five-star QB and one of the best tailback tandems in the country, had been blown into the Tennessee River by halftime, if not sooner. The alternative to "not that surprising" is "I expected it"; Mark, did you expect that all this would happen? If you did, why'd we even charter a team bus up to Knoxville in the first place?

Let me slow down a bit before someone here in the Starbucks on 11th Avenue plugs me with a tranquilizer dart: It's entirely conceivable that Tennessee's 2-2 record, constructed as it was against pretty good teams, was a sort of reverse mirage, and that even a Georgia team performing at its highest level wouldn't have been able to beat the Vols at Neyland on Saturday. OK, fine. Honestly, given the high tensions and various motivating factors working on both sides in this game, a loss, while disappointing, would not have surprised me; and if the Dawgs had played their best but still not been able to seal the deal, I would've been bummed this morning, but I would've accepted it. Does anyone think, though, that we played at our highest level on Saturday? Does anyone, either inside or outside of Bulldog Nation, think that this team's baseline -- even taking into account youth, injuries, whatever -- is sub-Arkansas State?


The sun rising in the east: not surprising. Georgia being down 28-0 at halftime: slightly more so.

Sorry, Mark, but that game surprised me on a number of levels, and the fact that it didn't surprise you makes me wonder what the hell you guys were doing all of last week. What happened out there on the practice field, exactly? Or in the film room? Supposedly we were all fired up about avenging last year's collapse in Athens; what the hell happened to that? Anyone who reads Sunday Morning Quarterback knows that stats are fickle things, and they'll often lead you to conclusions completely at odds with the reality on the field, but when Georgia gets that thoroughly and immediately humiliated by a team with whom they supposedly matched up that favorably, it goes back to coaching. I'm not going to call for anyone to get fired based on a single game, but make no mistake, Mark, you guys fucked up. Georgia obviously doesn't win every game, we don't even look good in every single game, but rare is the time when I can say that we just didn't look prepared, that we looked like we hadn't bothered to watch so much as a minute of film on our opponent. This, however, is one of those times, and for you to declare the result "not that surprising" implies a degree of meek acceptance that really doesn't cut it anywhere in the Southeastern Conference, much less in Athens.

Yes, CMR has been very careful not to inflate expectations this season; he's been relatively candid about the shortcomings on both the offensive and defensive lines in particular, even when the team's been winning. But there's really no such thing as postgame sandbagging in this business -- around here we simply call that making excuses. And while I can't blame you for not being surprised that Tennessee turned out to be a pretty good team, I find it hard to believe that you wouldn't be surprised at our team playing that poorly. If that's the kind of team we really are, coach, then we might as well forfeit the remainder of the season.

The thing is, I don't think that's the kind of team we really are. That's the silver lining here -- OK, maybe only a stainless-steel lining. We thrashed Oklahoma State and beat Alabama on the road this year; we have empirical evidence that we are not completely clueless on the gridiron. If this was indeed the worst performance of the Mark Richt era -- and make no mistake, it was -- then take some solace in the fact that it took nearly seven full seasons to lay a turd that big on the field. I'm no mathematician, but I've got to think that it is statistically damn near impossible for us to play that poorly again this season. There's nowhere to go but up.

But we've got to go way up -- that game was so godawful that even incremental improvement may not be enough to beat Vanderbilt or Troy in the next few weeks, to say nothing of Florida, Auburn, or Kentucky -- and it's not going to happen by shrugging our shoulders and saying, "Well, I guess that's the best we can do." If you'll permit me to go back to the "Glengarry Glen Ross" well for the second time this season -- and yes, I realize that any season that inspires multiple invocations of Mamet plays is teetering dangerously close to self-parody -- I really wish someone would show up at our next team meeting and give a speech like this:



BLAKE

Nice guy? I don’t give a shit. Good father? Fuck you, go home and play with your kids.

(to the sales force)

You want to work here, close! You think this is abuse? You think this is abuse, you cocksucker? You can’t take this, how can you take the abuse you get on a sit? You don’t like it, leave. (pause) I can go out there tonight, the materials you got, make myself fifteen thousand dollars. Tonight! In two hours! Can you? (pause) Can you? (pause) Go and do likewise. A-I-D-A. Get mad, you son-of-a-bitches! Get mad!



Yes, guys, it is time to get mad. A loss like Saturday's is certainly enough to completely short-circuit your brain for a couple days, but if you don't care enough to get mad about it -- mad about the fact that Tennessee has now humiliated us two years in a row, mad about the fact that you let them run all over us, mad about the fact that you were too distracted to even remember where the fucking neutral zone was on a number of occasions -- then this might not be your game. If you expected to play this poorly, then you don't need to be playing at all. It is time to decide what this team's potential really is and then get mad that we didn't reach it, or even come anywhere close, on Saturday -- and if Richt can't get that mad on his own, then he needs to bring in David Pollack, or Russell Crowe, or even Alec fucking Baldwin himself, to get that mad on his behalf.

But somebody's got to get mad. Be stunned, lick your wounds for a day or two, but then get mad. Michigan cared enough to do that, and they're 2-0 in the Big Ten right now. Southern Cal, I have no doubt, cares enough to do that and will demonstrate as much against Arizona this weekend. If we care enough to do that, from the coaches to the players right down to the waterboys, then we can hold our heads up high and win some fucking games this season. But if we don't, then there really isn't much point in even fielding a team the rest of the season, is there?

So it's time to decide.

Friday, October 5

A big decision in a town called malice: Revisiting Tennessee.



What I said at the time: The Big Orange emperor was declared to be, if not completely naked, then somewhat scantily clad.

Lost in the what-the-hell-just-happened second-guessing over the Dawgs’ blowout loss to UT last year was the fact that they actually had a 24-7 lead on the Vols at one point, and Joe Tereshinski, bless his poor maligned Polish soul, was moving the team along pretty authoritatively before the wheels came off in the second half. The Vols ended up finishing a so-so 54th in the nation in pass-efficiency defense, and that situation may not improve much with only one returning starter (Jonathan Hefney) in the secondary.

. . .

I hear all kinds of people telling me how great they are -- they were picked to finish second in the SEC East by regional sportswriters and got 16 votes to win the division -- but in the end I gotta say I just don’t see what the big deal is. . . . I have to concede a possibility that the Tennessee front four will dramatically exceed expectations and school Georgia’s rebuilt offensive line early and often. Even then, though, I’m reminded of 2003, when Georgia came to Knoxville with an O-line that made this year’s look like the ’83 Redskins’; the running game didn’t accomplish much until the game was already well in hand, granted, but that rickety line still gave David Greene enough time to tear the Tennessee secondary several new ones.


What's happened since then: Georgia has put together a 4-1 record, 2-1 in the SEC, with only a close loss to currently 11th-ranked South Carolina mucking things up; Tennessee has alternated blowout losses to ranked teams (Cal and Florida) with solid but hardly overwhelming victories against mid-majors (Southern Miss and Arkansas State) to sit at 2-2.


Not appearing in your picture: "tackling."

Care to amend your initial statement, sir?: Not all that much, really. I think my lack of awe with respect to the Vols' defense has turned out to be justified; they're currently ranked 83rd in Division I-A against the pass, 88th against the run, and 95th overall (allowing a total of 439 yards a game). Granted, they've faced some impressive offenses over the first month of the season, but upchucking 59 points to Florida looks a lot less excusable now that the Gators have been figured out by Auburn, and even against the lesser offenses of Southern Miss and Arkansas State, their defense was less than Steel-Curtain-like.

Of course, the Georgia defense, while substantially better statistically than Tennessee's, has not been without problems of its own. The AJC's Chip Towers dishes the inconvenient truth that in three conference games, the defense has displayed an unsettling tendency to give up long scoring drives at the most critical junctures -- to wit, the fourth-quarter South Carolina field goal that gave the 'Cocks a two-score lead; the two long fourth-quarter drives Alabama used to tie up the game in regulation; and the epic opening drive of the second half that ended with Ole Miss tying the Dawgs at 17. In the latter two instances, the offense picked up the slack and put the game away, and they may yet be able to do that against Tennessee's defense, but given that the Dawgs pissed away a 24-7 lead in last year's game and ended up losing by three scores, I'd rather not hand over any more momentum to Erik Ainge than we absolutely have to.

The Bulldog defense does have one big motivator, though: the fact that, last year, Tennessee became only the second team ever to drop "half-a-hundred" on the Dawgs in their own house. The media have already put out a slew of stories about how that embarrassment continues to nag at the defense, and if that's gotten them to hunker down this week and focus on crushing the UT offense, so much the better.


If the Georgia players are anything like me, then their memories of that night are not exactly fond.

Last year the Vols' David-Cutcliffe-rejuvenated offense passed the ball 38 times and ran it 34; this year, the key to holding off UT has been to keep their offensive attack as one-dimensional as possible. Tennessee's rushing attack is only 75th in the nation right now after being held to 111 net rushing yards by Cal and only 37 by Florida; I think we'll have slightly better luck containing the rushing attack than we did last week against Ole Miss's mammoth offensive line, but even if we do, Ainge's arm still worries me. I said in the preseason that Cutcliffe would have the passing game operating nicely despite what basically amounted to a brand-new receiving corps, and so far, he has.

But then there's the wild card, which, as always, is special teams -- specifically the punt-return game. In Knoxville in 2001, Damien Gary returned a punt 72 yards for a score that shifted the momentum in the game and allowed Georgia to fight back from a 14-3 first-quarter deficit. In 2005, Thomas Flowers returned a punt 54 yards for a TD to put us up 20-7 in the fourth quarter. Last year, we got both a punt return and a kickoff return for TDs. So far this year, Georgia ranks 22nd in the country in punt-return yardage, with Mikey Henderson averaging about 15 yards per return (with a long of 63 against Oklahoma State).

Guess what? Tennessee is dead last in Division I-A in punt-return defense. Granted, only six of their 18 punts have been returned, but those six returns have averaged nearly 30 yards apiece.


If I could find a picture of his back for Vol fans to memorize, I'd use it.

I'd like to see Stafford test the opposing defense downfield, something we really haven't done a lot this season, but as long as we score first and get into a rhythm with the running game, I think we've got a great chance. We did both of those things against Alabama, so as imposing as Tennessee's stadium and crowd are, I'm confident Stafford won't let them into his head. Even if we get off to a fast start like we did in Tuscaloosa, Ainge is a dangerous enough passing threat that I don't see us ever putting the Vols too far in our rearview mirror, but if the defense can get a big stop or two in the second half and keep Ainge from turning the game into a shootout, we should be able to grab a one-touchdown victory, as originally predicted.

I will run up and down Highland Avenue in front of my apartment building wearing nothing but a Georgia flag if: Georgia wins by double digits. I may be pushing it a little bit by asking for that -- given that the Vegas oddsmakers are still going with Tennessee as the favorite, I should probably just be happy with a victory of any kind. But after last year's meltdown, we could use another big win over the Vols in their own house to show them that they haven't won back the daddy pants in this rivalry just yet.


Someday I'm going to have this enlarged, framed, and hung over my fireplace.

The Friday Random Ten+5 is not impressed.

You probably already have enough reason to question the integrity of some of my thought processes, but if not, here are some more: Five Things Apparently Everybody Likes But Me.



Andy Kaufman
Sorry, I know people find him almost universally hilarious, but there are not enough drugs in the world to make Andy Kaufman funny to me. I can give him a chuckle or two when he's playing Latka on "Taxi," but his stand-up isn't even the least bit amusing. Whenever I hear people describe him as a "genius" or an "innovator," I get the same confused, scrunched-up look on my face that I got back in 2003 when people were describing George W. Bush as a hero.



"Survivor"
I've only seen maybe 10 minutes' worth of this program over the course of its entire run, and even that was only by accident -- I was flipping through channels after the Super Bowl a couple years ago or something. But anyway, it just doesn't appeal to me. The reality-show trend as a whole has kind of flown right by me -- I was a huge fan of "The Amazing Race" for a while, and that's pretty much it -- but even so, if I wanted to watch groups of random assholes compete in canoe-racing or fire-building challenges, I'd go become a counselor at a summer camp. And no, skinny chicks in mud-covered bikinis don't turn me on.



The Toyota Camry
Just because something is the best-selling of its kind in America doesn't make it good. My dad first bought a Camry in 1992, and that was kind of a nice car, but then, in spite of much better options, he bought another one in 1997. And when he began his latest round of car-shopping this past summer, he said he'd probably go out and buy another one, but then we drove one: Yes, it's quiet and refined and it rides well, but it's also big and floaty on the road -- like a Japanese Buick -- and it just feels cheap and plasticky inside; even the new-car smell is appliance-like. Pops put the Camry at the bottom of his list, and if you've designed a car that's too boring for even my dad to enjoy, then you've really accomplished something. (Not only did he end up buying an Acura TL, but it's red, which for my dad is the equivalent of wearing a Hawaiian shirt and a sombrero to a board meeting.)



Alfred Hitchcock's "Vertigo"
Supposedly this is Hitchcock's masterpiece, but nothing about this movie rang true to me. It seemed over-the-top and contrived in a lot of parts, and the characters were barely plausible -- the calmness with which Kim Novak's character seems to tolerate Jimmy Stewart's increasing insanity just didn't seem real at all. "North By Northwest" has it beat by a mile.



Crab
The crab cakes they have every Thursday at Chez Fon Fon right around the block from me are fantastic, but other than that, I've never found crab meat anything other than just plain gross. The only time I ever did the hide-food-in-the-napkin trick as a child was during family gatherings on Christmas Eve -- it's a tradition in some Catholic circles to eat seafood for Christmas Eve dinner (yeah, we've got this weird thing for seafood, I really don't know what the deal is), and the mere smell of crab casserole wafting in from the kitchen was enough to make my stomach flop over a bit. I hated fish when I was a kid, too, and I'm gradually starting to come around on that, but if I haven't gotten to like crab by now, I probably never will. (Oddly enough, I find Old Bay crab seasoning to be awesome. I hardly ever make a Bloody Mary without it.)

Now that your respect for me is at an even lower level than it was before, here's the Ten:

1. The Supremes, "Come See About Me"
2. Dead Kennedys, "When Ya Get Drafted"
3. Pet Shop Boys, "Theme for the Pet Shop Boys"
4. Beck, "Beautiful Way"
5. Depeche Mode, "Happiest Girl" (Jack mix)
6. R.E.M., "Walk Unafraid"
7. Röyksopp, "Remind Me" (Someone Else's mix)
8. Texas, "Saint"
9. Gnarls Barkley, "Storm Coming"
10. Pet Shop Boys, "I Want to Wake Up" (Breakdown mix)

Your own Random Tens and/or "sorry, just don't get it" confessions are welcome in the comments, as usual.

Thursday, October 4

Orange you excited?: The UGA-UT roundtable.



Yes, ladies and germs, it's Georgia-Tennessee weekend, meaning that my favorite team is about to face one of only three teams over whom I might root for Osama bin Laden and the al-Qaeda All-Stars. Yet somehow, even a program as odious as Tennessee's somehow dumb-lucked their way into some halfway decent fans -- I'm referring, of course, to the guys at Rocky Top Talk, who were kind enough to volunteer (I kill myself!) to participate in a Dawg-Vol roundtable concerning the upcoming game. My pulled-out-of-my-ass answers to their questions about the Dawgs can be found here; their rather more insightful answers to my questions are as follows:

1. What were the general expectations in Knoxville for the Vols' 2007 season? Given the difficulty of the schedule they've played, is this one of those "better than the record indicates" kind of situations, or is .500 pretty much an accurate indication of the kind of team they are at the moment?

Vol fans ran the gamut on this question pre-season, but most (30%) predicted we'd go 10-2. Woo! Twenty-two percent thought we'd go 9-3. Woo. These predictions were based on (1) a belief in Erik Ainge and a passel of wicked fast young receivers, (2) spiriting pre-season reports that the running game was vastly improved!, and (3) a collective belief that the linebackers were great, the defensive line was, um, better, and that All-SEC senior safety Jonathan Hefney could teach an inexperienced secondary everything they needed to know to succeed in the SEC early enough to make a difference.

Hmm. Four games in, it's looking like only Ainge has met expectations. He's in command of the offense, checking off at the line to get the team into the right plays and out of the wrong ones. He's throwing with almost lethal accuracy to a group of heretofore inexperienced receivers, and he's doing it all with a broken pinky finger. So yay.

But . . .

We're basically playing with three possession receivers, and while they've been stretching the field a little bit, like a phonebook-thick rubber band, they're still having trouble getting behind the secondary, and we've not really been able to work the jets into the rotation. Since we're in the midst of an elastic metaphor, let's say those guys are like unbound balloons, shooting all over the field in random and exciting directions. "Ethel, d'ja see them youngins? They sure can get in the wrong place in a hurry, cain't they?"

Add to that the fact that our offensive line isn't run-blocking very well, Arian Foster is proving to be merely pedestrian, our linebackers (and the rest of our defense) are still learning how to tackle, our defensive line looks remarkably similar to last year's line, and Jonathan Hefney has disappointed, and we've got trouble.

Still, our only two losses are away games to No. 3 Cal and No. 9 Florida (BlogPoll numbers), and, yeah, our record is better than it looks. The problem isn't so much those losses, but the weaknesses that those losses exposed. Bottom line, I don't think we're .500, but we'll be fortunate to get 9-3. We're probably looking at 8-4 or so. Not woo.

2. With only one returning starter in the secondary, the Vols' pass defense was generally assumed to be a potential weakness this season, but from what I gather the front seven hasn't performed all that well either despite having plenty of talent. At the risk of sounding like Seinfeld, what's the deal with those guys, and what are their prospects for improving?


OK, so this might be a slight exaggeration.

I'm not so sure about the talent thing. We have some, but we have no Glenn Dorseys or Derrick Harveys. The linebackers, except perhaps for Rico McCoy, have been the biggest disappointment so far, primarily due to the fact that it's really the only unit we expected to play really well. Our tackles and ends are getting pushed around on running plays, but they did show a bit of improvement in pressuring the quarterback against Arkansas State. Prospects for continued improvement? Decent, but not as much as we need because we have too far to go. The secondary, by the way, is coming together (I may have the minority view on this among Vol fans), and we should see relatively dramatic improvement from them over the next several games.

3. Tennessee has a pretty deep stable of RBs this year, but none of them appear to have stepped up to become The Man just yet. Which one do you think presents the biggest threat to Georgia's defense?

LaMarcus Coker, no doubt. Arian Foster is good, and he has deceptive speed in that when you see him running, he's going a lot faster than you think he is. Think Matt Jones; defenders are liable to misjudge him and let him get right past them. Once they get a bead on him, though, they'll be able to catch him from that point on.

They can't catch LaMarcus Coker, though. He's both quick enough to get around you and fast enough to leave you in the dust, and he's getting back into the swing of things after a suspension for much of pre-season camp and the first game against Cal. Watch out, too, for true freshman Lennon Creer, who seems to have Foster's power and vision, and Coker's speed and quickness. He's a keeper.


I'll be laying waste to one of these double-deuces on Saturday, but it's up to the Dawgs' front seven to handle the other.

4. What do you see as being the most favorable matchup for Tennessee on Saturday? Which one has you the most worried?

Most favorable for us is Ainge versus Georgia's pass defense. Our passing offense is 22nd in the nation and 1st in the SEC. Yes, even better than Kentucky's Andre Woodson, who hasn't played either Cal or Florida. The Bulldogs' pass defense is 7th in the SEC, so that has to be our biggest advantage.

Most favorable for you is any play, excluding field goals and PATs, involving a foot. We have an excellent punter and an excellent kicker, but unless they can force a fair catch or a touchback, chances are the guy catching and running won't be touched until he's tackled in the end zone by his own players. We're 91st in net punting (and 113th in the nation in punt returns to boot!). The kickoff coverage numbers are a lot better, but kickoffs are still quite frightening.

5. The home team has lost the last four games in this series; Mark Richt's teams have performed very well on the road, particularly in Knoxville. How much does the concept of a "home-field disadvantage" factor into your thinking about this game?

I agree with Paul, who said earlier this week that a stadium is intimidating (or not) not because of what it is but because of who plays there. As you and I discussed earlier this summer, this series of late has been a heartbreaking one with many games being decided by horrid momentum swings, many of which have come at the other's place. A good stadium can be quite intimidating when a team is playing well, but it can have a huge counter-effect when scores of thousands of fans are in a collective state of shock.

6. The current scuttlebutt on Fulmer's job security runs the complete spectrum from "He's safe" to "He's gone if they don't win 10 games" even to "He's retiring after this season." Which do you think is closest to the truth? If Fulmer really is on the hot seat, what would it take for him to remain secure going into 2008?

The truth is almost certainly somewhere in the middle of those extremes. Win an SEC Championship this year, and he's probably safe for another five to eight years. Suffer another Season of Which We Do Not Speak, and he'll be gone when the last whistle blows this November. Most likely, he has another two, maybe three, years of 8-4s left.


No, it's not nice, but no one ever said this was a friendly business.

7. Finally, if you could steal one thing about Georgia's program or tradition and make it Tennessee's -- a player, a coach, a famous alum, something about Athens, whatever -- what would it be? Of course, if you think everything about Georgia sucks and you want no part of it, feel free to say so.

I love Mark Richt. Great coach, great guy, impossible to hate, and I hate him for it. Loved his involvement in "Facing the Giants," and I think he's done just terrific things for the program there. So, I'll take all of him and a side of your recruiting base, please.

(Joel from Rocky Top Talk and Andy from the UT blog Corn From a Jar also did Q&As with Georgia Sports Blog's Paul Westerdawg; Andy's responses to Paul's questions are here, and Joel's are here.)

The unbearable Nice™ness of being.


Sorry, Eddie, the ladies aren't a fan.

Over the past few months I've read a number of posts written by female bloggers calling shenanigans on the concept of the "Nice Guy™" -- i.e., the guys who (outwardly, at least) are polite, gentlemanly, treat the women they go out with like princesses, but can't ever seem to get any of those women to be his girlfriend, much less get laid. This post from Jill at Feministe, a blog that's been a favorite of my sister's for a while now and that I've been reading more and more lately, finally inspired me to spill my guts on the subject.

The reason I'd been holding back for a while was more out of embarrassment than anything else, because for a while -- not so very long ago, in fact -- I was That Guy: the guy who did everything politely and by-the-book and would treat a woman wonderfully, to no avail in terms of actually having a more-than-friends relationship with any of them. Actually, let me back up a bit here: I was, and in some ways continue to be, the latest of late bloomers. I didn't go out on a date, much less have an actual girlfriend, until my senior year of high school; I didn't have an actual drink until graduation night; I didn't lose my virginity until I was 20 and just a couple months from graduating from college. For virtually every "milestone" of a young man's life, I was about four years behind everyone else I knew, and though some of that had to do with the fact that I'd skipped second grade and was younger than everybody else, you could take that out of the equation and I still would've been playing catch-up.


Kind of like this, only less confident.

So as you might expect for someone who was young and inexperienced and feeling like the rest of the world was flying right by him, I got pretty desperate at times. And desperation, I think, is the staple of the Nice Guy™. Girls don't seem to be responding to you no matter what you try, so you get more and more desperate, and there comes a point at which you're not on the lookout for a certain kind of woman, you'll just take any woman (as long as she's hot, of course). And take it from a guy who has been there and made those mistakes: Once you start seeing women as this big, monolithic "hive mind" in which each interchangeable unit is no different from the next, you're setting yourself up to look like a douchebag.

That, I think, is the point where Josh Bass is at right now. Bass is the sophomore journalism major at Southern Cal whose column in the Daily Trojan on "the death of chivalry" prompted Jill's post, and after reading his column, I wanted to close my eyes and find a hole to crawl into -- partly out of embarrassment for him, but partly out of embarrassment for myself, because I know I held some of the same frustrations and laughably mistaken ideas when I was a naive, undersexed, increasingly desperate UGA sophomore 11 years ago. I hope I wasn't as dickish or self-pitying about it as Bass is, and I certainly hope I would never have banged out such a melodramatic, overwritten column about it -- at some point in your journalism training, dude, you're gonna learn that nobody's impressed by extra words for extra words' sake -- but I don't know that I was all that far off, either.

Josh, apparently, wants to hold doors for women. He wants to buy them dinner and pay for their movies. And I'm guessing he wants to have a committed, monogamous relationship with one of them. Which is fine; some women out there want that too. A male who wants those things is a traditionalist but not automatically an asshole.


Or a tricorn hat/tights-wearer.

Josh, however, thinks that every woman out there wants that, or should. His views on male-female relationships are like the gender-role remix of every shitty, derivative comic you've ever seen on "Def Comedy Jam": Men are like this, women are like this. Josh wants to hold doors and pay for dinner and treat his women like princesses, therefore that means all women should want to have doors held and dinner paid for and be treated like princesses. And anyone who doesn't is a Feminazi or a harlot. (Yes, he actually uses those words.)

You know, life would probably be a lot easier if male-female interactions were that simple -- male does X, female does Y, a beautiful relationship blossoms -- and a desire for that kind of simplicity burns in the heart of every Nice Guy™. For whatever reason, they've been caught behind the curve in terms of figuring women out, they don't know what to do, and they want someone to make it easier for them. They're the reason Maxim prints articles on 10 sure-fire ways to get that honey at the bar to go home with you; they're the ones spending money on books and courses on "speed seduction" and the like. They want to have someone else hand it to them; they're not comfortable with taking anything more than a passive role in the whole process, because they lack self-confidence and don't trust themselves to figure it out on their own. And when they get shot down, when something comes along that doesn't jibe with the "tips" or "rules" that they read in Maxim or that goes against their regimented view of how men and women should be, they don't want it to be their fault.

Basically, it sounds like Josh Bass is just sitting back and hoping that a woman will notice his chivalry and will be so impressed by it that she'll just up and jump his bones, without him ever having to do anything more than holding a door or picking up a check. Or as Josh ends his column:

After all, there are women all over the world who have male confidants and close friends, but they never for once take a step back and realize that the person with whom they are constantly sharing their romantic woes is in fact ­- male.

And so to that widow of romance out there, when next the words seem about to spill unbidden from your lips, bite your tongue and look a little harder. You may have to seek, my lady, but ye shall find.


It's ironic: Josh's very traditional view of the world says that men should be the "strong, capable" caretakers in the relationship, while women should be soft, feminine, and dependent on their knights in shining armor, yet he expects the women to take charge and accept the active role in "seeking" and "finding" while he just sits there being gentlemanly and courteous -- in other words, Nice™.


Just keep snoozing, buddy, that plane ain't never gonna come.

And that dog won't hunt. I have a friend (whom I obviously won't call out by name) who, for a while now, has had a thing for a girl at our church. It's been nearly a year, and as far as I can ascertain, he's never actually asked her out. He's had plenty of chances -- she sings in the choir, he plays an instrument, they practice together all the time -- but he just hasn't pulled the trigger yet. After observing this situation for months -- mainly just waiting for him to shit or get off the pot because, full disclosure, I'd kind of like to ask this girl out, dammit -- I really think he's hoping that she'll be so impressed by his guitar-playing ability or how in shape he is or whatever that she'll be overcome and ask him out so that he doesn't have to do it himself.

That never, ever works. You know how I know? Because that's what I did for years, and that "strategy" was pretty much responsible for me staying a virgin until I was almost old enough to drink. Girls just don't do that. I don't care what your dad or Maxim told you, there's no amount of coolness, gentlemanliness, or chivalry that will be so overwhelming that a woman will make an unprompted move on you. Ask her out or don't ask her out, but if you stay silent and you end up sitting around by yourself on Friday night, it probably has less to do with the fact that the female in question is some uppity skank who's too shallow to appreciate your wonderfulness than it does with the fact that you are being -- how do I put this gently? -- a fucking wuss.

On the other hand, if you do sack up and ask her out, and you do so in a chivalrous and princess-treating, pedestal-placing fashion, and things still don't swing your way, you know what? That's life. Some women don't want to be treated like princesses or placed on pedestals, and your insistence on doing so isn't going to bring her around to your way of thinking; it only amounts to cramming a square peg into a round hole, and ensures that your round peg isn't going to get crammed into anything. Again, women are all different and are not required by law to appreciate the same things, so if you go into a given situation convinced that holding doors + buying the movie tickets = poontang every single time, but the female in question isn't down with that, that doesn't mean that she's some uppity Feminazi bitch; it only proves you've done a shitty job of market research.

I know, it seems to defy logic that someone might not want things to be bought, done, or smoothed over for her -- don't we all love stuff to be taken care of for us? But the night I ended up in the sack with a woman who didn't want me to give her oral -- it wasn't that time of the month or anything, she just didn't like it -- was when I officially abandoned the idea that any assumption about what women want, no matter how much of a lead-pipe cinch it might seem, was universally applicable to all women.


Believe it or not, that exit's closed.

The Nice Guy™, though, having reduced all women to one big, anonymous species, is so busy buying or doing stuff for those women that he isn't paying any attention to whether they're things that she needs or wants. A few years back, my sister -- a fiercely independent feminist, though hardly of the hairy-legged man-hating stereotype -- was engaged to a Nice Guy™ who was courteous, capable, and, unfortunately, thick as a bridge abutment. His thought processes operated with the if-A-then-B simplicity of a Texas Instruments calculator: If Ann's TV broke, it meant BUY HER NEW TV, never stopping to consider that maybe she'd want to pick out a TV herself. If her boss had overloaded her at work all week long, it meant COME OVER AND COMFORT HER, even when she only wanted to drink a glass of wine and decompress alone. His heart was kind of in the right place, but not really, since he saw her as an object to be coddled and protected but never actually listened to. She tried to clue him in on this, but it never quite stuck -- and eventually, in spite of the emotional heartache (not to mention the bad blood with his family) it created, she gave back the ring and sent him on his way. That may sound harsh, but it's what happens when Nice Guys™ try to impose their very general, not-terribly-well-thought-out views of opposite-sex relationships onto individual, complex people.

In the interest of full disclosure, I want to dispel any notion that I think I'm some kind of relationship expert here. I'm doing better now than I was when I was a college sophomore who could barely pick a clitoris out of a lineup, but by no means do I have this relationship/attraction thing completely figured out. As a recovering Nice Guy™, though, I do feel like have some sage advice on what not to do that might be valuable to guys who are still sitting around waiting for someone to drop a Playmate in their lap.


Which really only ever happens to one guy anyway.

And that advice boils down to this: Sorry, but the Nice Guy™ shit doesn't work. If you don't have anything deeper than door-holding or check-picking-up to offer, it's time to go back into the locker room and draw up some new plays. Sack up, Josh Bass, and ask a girl out instead of waiting for her to notice and appreciate your chivalrous awesomeness and then writing whiny, bitter columns when she doesn't. If you do go out with her, listen to what she says and find something more than just blond hair and a pair of tits to appreciate about her; don't just go into it thinking HOLD DOORS BUY PRESENTS ROBBLE ROBBLE as if that's all any woman has ever wanted since the beginning of time. And, as Kenneth the page said on "30 Rock," work that vajayjay.

As for me, I've put the nice-guy shit aside and evolved into what I'd call a Laissez-Faire Neanderthal. Yeah, my default position is to hold doors and offer to pay for stuff; that's how I was raised. But if a woman doesn't want that, fine with me. I'm not gonna force it on her, and I'm not gonna take that as a cue to ask why she hates men so much. It takes different strokes to rule the world, yes it does, and if you can't figure that out and make your peace with it, not getting any is going to be the least of your problems.

Tuesday, October 2

BlogPoll roundtable #4: After everything went kablooey.


Oops . . . that wasn't your team, was it?

I gotta hand it to this week's roundtable host, My Opinion On Sports: Less than 48 hours removed from his Oklahoma Sooners getting punked by Colorado, he still mustered the will to come up with some questions and do the roundtable. As far as anyone knows, all his personal possessions are even intact. Clearly, then, a better man than I am.

The Battle for #1 -- USC and LSU are separated by one vote in the AP poll. We made the switch in last week’s blogpoll by putting the Tigers in our top spot. State your case for who should be the top team in the country.

It's a little harder making the case for LSU after they spent 30 minutes limpdicking around against Tulane, but whatever ass-chewing Les Miles did in the locker room at halftime paid off, as the Tigers outscored the Green Wave 24-0 after the break and could've piled on more if they hadn't called off the dogs late in the fourth quarter.

So I still think LSU is number one. USC's case for the top spot has been dinged by a steady stream of injuries, particularly to the offensive line, which lost OG Chilo Rachal against Washington on Saturday; they also haven't found a receiver yet who can truly step into the shoes of either Dwayne Jarrett or Steve Smith. LSU's defense is every beat SC's equal, if not better, but I believe they've got more playmakers on offense, and they're also versatile -- if you take away the pass, they'll just run it down your throat, and if Matt Flynn is hurt, no big deal, they'll just throw Ryan Perrilloux at you. An LSU-USC game on a neutral field would be thrilling for 60 minutes, no doubt, but I think LSU would win it.


And then maybe they'll finally give this shit a rest.

Oklahoma, Florida, West Virginia, Texas and Rutgers were all upset this weekend. Of those teams, who has the best shot of getting back into the national title hunt?

Oklahoma, partly because, as I explained in my BlogPoll ballot, I think their upset loss was the "flukiest" of all the shockers that occurred on Saturday, in the sense that their performance was the most aberrant compared to the way they'd played earlier i the season. But I also think they're still the strongest team by a healthy margin in the Big XII. If they beat Texas in the Red River Shootout this weekend, which they should, they'll be right back on track for a second straight conference title; all of the good teams left on their schedule have to come to Norman, and while theoretically a Missouri or a Texas Tech might be good enough to knock off the Sooners, I think they got their wake-up call from Colorado and are much less likely to cough up a win in those games. If everyone else loses between now and December, or even if the BCS is looking for someone to go up against the last remaining undefeated team in the national title game, I think a 12-1, Big-XII-champion OU team would be a very attractive prospect.


Looking at the current AP Top 10, who is grossly overrated and who should be in there that isn’t?


Bitches used to laugh at me, now they on my jock.

As far as the overrateds, I know I may have turned into a curmudgeon for curmudgeonry's sake here, but I still have a very hard time seeing Kentucky as the #8 team in the country. They're good, but the two games we thought were marquee wins at the time -- Louisville and Arkansas -- have lost a considerable amount of luster now that both those opponents have been proven to have very little mustard on defense. Also, Wisconsin may be 5-0, but what's their best performance so far? Doubling up on a mediocre Washington State team? Needing a late FG to get by Michigan State? That's not going to get them very far against Ohio State or Michigan, and it may not even get them all that far in Champaign this weekend.

Who isn't in the top 10 who should be? Honestly, probably no one. After last weekend's massacre, teams that looked truly top-10-worthy are looking scarcer than gay Muslims at the Republican National Convention. But I kinda have to take some pity on West Virginia; you've got to wonder if having Pat White for the second half might've been worth the single TD the Mountaineers eventually lost by. They didn't look well-prepared against USF, but with a full and healthy complement of playmakers, I'm convinced WVU is still good enough to beat 95 percent of the teams in the country.

What is the worst coaching mistake you’ve seen this season?


Hiyo!! Did somebody say "bad coaching mistake"?

Dennis Franchione giving Jovorskie Lane only two carries against Miami. Let me make sure I've got this right, Fran -- your brilliant strategy of forcing QB Stephen McGee to provide every last shred of your offense isn't working, so at halftime you adjust by . . . continuing to pile the entire game on McGee's back? And you don't think your gigantic man-beast of a running back, the guy who scored 19 touchdowns for you last season, has anything to contribute? Orson is right: Franchione is a total fucking idiot. If he still has a job at the end of this season, you may take that as a sign that the A&M administration has finally given up on any hope of competing with Texas and Oklahoma on a regular basis.

Monday, October 1

BlogPoll ballot #6: Man, does everybody suck at this game?

You thought Appalachian State over Michigan was just an isolated incident? Apparently, this season it was a harbinger of things to come.

I'm going to warn you -- this ballot is going to look pretty effed up at first glance, or even second or third. But that's kind of what happens when seven of the AP's top 15 teams all get whacked by lesser-ranked (in several cases unranked) squads. If none of the traditional powers could get anything done on Saturday, then the top spots are going to end up being filled by powers who are, shall we say, non-traditional.

Games watched: South Florida-West Virginia, rotated between Purdue-Notre Dame and Georgia Tech-Clemson whilst listening to Georgia-Ole Miss over the Internet (multitasking!), the second half of FSU-Alabama, all of Auburn-Florida.

1. LSU (last week: 1)

2. Southern California (2)

3. California (6)

4. Ohio State (7)

5. Boston College (10)

6. Wisconsin (11)
Wisconsin didn't look impressive the first four weeks of the season and honestly didn't look that impressive in squeaking by Michigan State on Saturday. But man, if not Wisconsin, then who? Like I said, anyone looking for name-brand programs to put in the top 10 is having a hell of a time after Massacre Saturday. I'm just going to have to convince myself that Michigan State could actually be pretty good this year, I guess.

7. South Florida (19)

8. Oklahoma (3)
I know a five-slot drop is pretty lenient for a team that got whacked by an unranked Colorado squad coming off a 2-10 season, but . . . no disrespect to the Buffs or anything, but of all the big upsets last week, this one seemed the "flukiest." Basically, it looks like the Sooners got too cocky with a 24-7 lead, and while that was indeed a horribly played second half, I see it as being the exception as opposed to the rule based on what I've seen from OU so far this season. I still think they'd very likely beat any of the teams ranked below them.

9. South Carolina (15)
Probably too big a jump for a team that only beat Mississippi State (and needed a while to do that), but again, who do I put above them -- and if Spurrier has finally found a QB who can competently run his offense, watch out.

10. West Virginia (4)

11. Arizona State (14)

12. Oregon (9)

13. Florida (5)

14. Kentucky (13)
No, I'm probably not giving the Wildcats enough credit, but consider that their two supposed "marquee" wins are over Louisville and Arkansas. If they get a win in Columbia on Thursday, though, they will unequivocally be for real.

15. Georgia (16)
Only a one-point jump for the Dawgs after a 45-17 conference win? I think it's fair, given that they needed 40 minutes or so to really put Ole Miss away and it's still hard to decipher where exactly they figure in the conference race. But if they can beat Tennessee convincingly up in Knoxville, I'll be prepared to call them top-10 material -- and they may also be right back in the thick of the conference race.

16. Auburn (NR)
Considering how good Kansas State and South Florida looked on Saturday, I think it's safe to say that Auburn's performances against them are nothing to be ashamed of.

17. Rutgers (8)

18. Michigan (22)

19. Missouri (25)

20. Texas (12)

21. Virginia Tech (21)

22. Illinois (NR)
I can't believe I'm ranking a Ron Zook team . . . but it was that kind of a weekend.

23. Hawaii (24)

24. Arkansas (23)

25. Penn State (18)

The next five: UCLA, Tennessee, Cincinnati, Kansas State, Maryland.

Dropped out: Alabama (17), Clemson (20).