Thursday, July 21

Today's question for conservatives. (I'm thinking about making this a regular feature.)

Evidently Dick Durbin decrying prisoner abuses at Guantanamo Bay inflames and encourages our terrorist enemies, but suggesting that we nuke Mecca does not. Explain.

OK, so it's more of an essay question.

99 comments:

bill from jc said...

Kinda quiet round here. Must be about time for Anon to change the subject....

Anonymous said...

That you, billshit? Thought you had a stroke.

dougie, there's more to this story beyond your out-of-context vignette from your referenced leftist blog. Here's the rest of the story:

'The reference to bombing holy sites, he said, came up in a discussion about possible ways the U.S. could respond to nuclear strikes against its cities by terrorists.
"I simply throw that out there as something to think about, although it is horrendous to think about, I understand that," Tancredo said. "So is having one or more cities destroyed in the United States. And that's all I did."'

So, dougie, I'll be big about it, Tancredo's comment when taken out-of-context was over-the-top and inappropriate. Sorry. Sorta.

While we're soliciting apologies, how about Turban Durbin's apology? Now that his crapola about Gitmo has been discounted, where's Turban's apology? Check out this legit reference (you seem to defer to liberal propaganda blogs for your sources, I'll rise above that):
http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20050718-122024-7366r.htm

How about Julianne Malveaux's apology? Did you know we're terrorists? We're not a good country?

And when are you going to apologize for Dean? Just for Dean. Everything about Dean is offensive.

Come on dougie, let's be fair and balanced and ACCURATE about this. Yes?

Steve said...

Interesting Durbin's statements are given the lofty description of "decrying prisoner abuse" versus "a nutty gulag comparision".

While not buying into a "encourages our terrorist enemies" argument, I will say that that both are stupid.

Anonymous said...

Durbin did apologize, dipstick. But thanks for promoting the Washington Times as an allegedly fair and balanced antidote to "liberal propaganda." Haven't laughed that hard in weeks.

BTW, who the fuck is Julianne Malveaux?

Anonymous said...

Settle down, billshit, Viagra and high blood pressure are a deadly mix. You know how to google, I suggest you try it on Julianne Malveaux.

Anybody seen an apology from Turban?

Anonymous said...

I found the Turban apology and stand corrected. A damn honorable apology at that. doug, are you going to apologize for promoting Turban's inappropriate comments in your blog?

Now, when are we going to get a retraction from Malveaux?

Righteously yours,
Anonymous I

Kevin said...

Why would Malveaux retract an opinion?

Anonymous said...

Do your homework,moron. Malveaux offered examples of why we are terrorists.

Anonymous said...

Ha ha. Bill may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer, but he sure had you pegged -- you changed the subject in a heartbeat, going from the subject at hand (an elected official bandying about the idea of nuking Middle Eastern cities) to some Malveaux chick nobody's ever heard of. Sounds like Bill almost knows you better than you know yourself. Oh, but thanks for taking the time in the middle of your subject-changing to admit you don't know what the hell you're talking about when it comes to Dick Durbin. Those of us with more than three functioning brain cells are mighty impressed with your maturity and emotional growth.

Anonymous said...

Damn, billshit, mighty fine of you to admit that you're the dimmest bulb in the liberal chandelier. But to use a pseudonym to praise yourself is very amusing and downright witless. (Your trademark mindless rambling gave you away.)

Kevin said...

It's still just an opinion....she shouldn't need to apologize for it.

Plus, she's not an elected official.

steve said...

I've said this before and will again. None of these people have anything to apologize for. Say whatever you want and let the voters decide. And non-elected officials, who cares. Every asshole has an opinion and a right to it.

Anonymous said...

No, Anonymous Half-Wit, I'm not Bill. Your obsession with him is cute though -- the two of you would make an adorable couple, and as a liberal I will fight for your right to love anyone you choose, no matter how much it makes me personally want to yack.

New topic: If Anonymous Half-Wit says something in the forest and nobody's there to hear it, is it still stupid?

bill from jc said...

Oddly enough I have been on the road for a couple of days, Anon II may be on to something. Having been rejected by his father, Anon I has latched onto me as his love idol, Sorry Anon, I am straight, but flattered by your amourous attentions. Like Anon II I think you should love whoever you love, but your attentions toward me cannot go anywhere so i suggest you return to Ann Coulter as a masterbatory fantasy. With that adams apple she is almost a man, and certainly more of a man than someone that is scared to put their name with thier inane stupid comments

Anonymous said...

Too billshits fer the priece of won? Crack hedds sepurated at burth? Imagin thet!
(Damn, it's hard to write like billshit!)

bill from jc said...

So Chickenshit, were you ever going to get around to answering Doug's question or were you here just to slander others?

And please stop thinking of me in your gay terms. I want nothing to do with your lifestyle.

As your weak jab at my spelling, how are the qualuuds working out for you dumbass? You conmen are all the same, too scared to fight, too stupid to think.

Anonymous said...

Ahhh, so Anonymous Half-Wit reverts to the "I Know You Are, But What Am I!" Defense. From the bottom of my heart, Anonymous #1, thank you for all the entertainment you've provided us. Mouth-breathers like you are a liberal's dream come true.

Now that you've been thoroughly punked, don't you have some burgers to flip? Or did the burger-flipping get too intellectually intense for you, so they put you on urinal-swabbing duty instead?

bill from jc said...

Be nice also Anon, his mommy is going to let him get a job just as soon as he finishes school.

Anonymous said...

C'mon billshit, we're not laughing at you, well, I guess we are. But it's so much fun to watch you blow your toothless liberal hick top.
Dougie's question has been answered, moron.
And the next time you bend over? Well, that ain't me you feel, that's one of your stupid liberal social progams porkin' you.
It was great comedy to watch Turban Durbin and Liberal Loser Leahy trying to act intelligent and dignified as they answered questions about the Roberts confirmation hearings this morning. What a couple of stooges. Good to see Turban eating Gitmo crow again for breakfast.
Speaking of liberal failures, did you all hear that NARAL and moveon.org prematurely released anti Edith Clement emails only to re-release and replace her name with John Roberts'? What a pathetic bunch of shitheads.
Hey, libs, get this...your next presidential nominee, Senator Clinton? Well remember her promise to produce 350,000 jobs in upstate New York if elected Senator? Her score to-date is minus, that's M-I-N-U-S 150,000 jobs! Remember how you pubes were trying to hang Bush on a 5.5% jobless rate? Well, the jobless rate is now 5.0%!
You fucking liberals are all a bunch of losers.

The one, the only, the original,
Anonymous I

bill from jc said...

So Sen. Clinton's job record is about 5.7 million better than W's? And Anon finds reason to brag in that?

Everytime i think your stupidity has bottomed out you exceed all expectations and dig your moronic hole a little deeper.

Does someone that supports Bush really want to argue about jobs? Are you sure that's a good thing to do chickenshit?

Anonymous said...

Leave it to Anonymous I, when cornered, to just start throwing out stuff that precisely nobody cares about. First Blah Blah Malveaux, now some who-cares NARAL press release. He's pulled more stuff out of his ass than Richard Gere.

Whenever you want to talk about something important, Anonymous I the Half-Witted, I'll be ready. Here's something to get you started: Why did the Ashcroft Justice Department block efforts in 2002 to prosecute someone now wanted in the London transit bombings? Why is it that whenever the Bush administration has a chance to actually do something to stop terrorism, they go out of their way to fuck it up?

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002399039_aswat24m.html

Anonymous said...

That you Dougie? Been wondering when you'd show up but I guess the pseudonym will allow you to stay above the fray. Okay by me, after all you've got that big time government job to protect.
Funny, I don't feel cornered. Do you all? Well, I guess it would be reasonable to assume as much given that you haven't had a winning season since, what, 1992? Liberal Losersville, what a place to live in. What a burden to bear, or as billshit would say, bare.
Question. What are you gonna do now that you can't win at the polls and you won't be able to win at the bench with Roberts ridin' into Dodge?
Like I've said many times before, if you've got a problem with Bush, it's your own fault. Gore, Kerry and soon to come, Clinton, losers every one. Find some conservative democrat next time, you just might have a slim chance. You liberal losers don't stand a chance against any repub with half a mind.
Hey, toothless, where'd you get your jobless stats, UT's econ class for football players?
By the way, where have you boys been hiding Dean. He's always good for a laugh or two. Put him back on the reservation?

Steve said...

Actually Bill, latest stats show more Americans working then at any time in history. Table turned in May or June I think. Bush has created jobs in the same sense that he was responsible for the loss of jobs.

bill from jc said...

"Bush has created jobs in the same sense that he was responsible for the loss of jobs."..... the fuck???? Are you really spewing that up is down, right is left double speak with a straight face? Which looking glass did you fall thru. Bush has presided over the largest job loss in history. He has created nothing. Over 3 million jobs lost since he took office. The illusion of low unemployment was created by the labor dept no longer counting the chronically unemployed in the compilation (it was changed so that only those drawing unemployment were counted. While this is a great victory for republican accountants it doesnt do much for those americans that have exhausted thier benifits.) Nice try though Steve, it was nice to have a conservative to at least attempt to argue from reason. I am curious, do the rest of the reasonable conservatives enjoy being identified with Anon I AKA "Chicken shit"???

Anonymous said...

Yeah sure, whatever, Anonymous the Half-Witted. Nice little rant, but (as usual) nothing original, nothing of substance. "Ha-ha, you lost the election! Howard Dean likes to scream, tee-hee!" You never have any original thoughts or anything to say on any issues that are actually important, just a bunch of GOP talking points and some third-rate jokes that probably wouldn't make the cut for a Jay Leno monologue.

And all that talk about "Liberal Losersville" is pretty ballsy for a dude whose hero Dubya was barely keeping his head above a 40% approval rating even before the Rovegate story broke. Who's the knight in shining armor who's gonna lead y'all to another victory in 2008? Bill Frist, who can diagnose people by video and make tall logical leaps in a single bound? Little Jebbie Bush? How about Tom DeLay? Hey, that'd be great -- the first presidential campaign ever run from a prison cell. Let me know if anyone in your party somehow muscles their IQ above 60, Anonymous the Half-Witted, maybe THEN we'll start worrying about losing another election.

Anonymous said...

Ahhh, it's now certain that the anonymous wannabe is none other than billshit himself!

Billshit, given that you liberal fuckwads are gonna give us the Hillary option in '08, I'm thinking I'll run for prez myself. Any "half-witted" conservative can beat ole' piano legs and her delivering MINUS 150,000 jobs to upstate NY.

Steve, you've gone and done it now. Logic, reason and facts just confuse and annoy the liberalistas that hang-out here.

So, billshit, unemployment data today is all an illusion? Was it an illusion when Clinton was at the helm? Or when you were tracking job loss under George? Let me guess...it was good data then and bad data now. The data's illusional and billshit's delusional.

Anonymous said...

LIBERAL FAILURE ALERT!!!!

Continuing coverage of the great liberal implosion...this just in:

Sources: Teamsters, SEIU to Bolt AFL-CIO
By RON FOURNIER
AP Political Writer

CHICAGO ? Organized labor is at war with itself as the Teamsters and a major service employees' union decide to bolt from the AFL-CIO, paving the way for two other groups to sever ties in the labor movement's biggest rift since the 1930s.

The Teamsters and the Service Employees International Union, the largest AFL-CIO affiliate with 1.8 million members, intended to announce Monday that they are leaving the federation after failing to reform the 50-year-old labor giant, according to several labor officials who spoke on condition of anonymity. (The source was not Anonymous I)

The unions are part of the Change to Win Coalition, seven labor groups vowing to accomplish what the AFL-CIO has failed to do: Reverse the decades-long decline in union membership. But many union presidents, labor experts and Democratic Party leaders fear the split will weaken the movement politically and hurt unionized workers who need a united and powerful ally against business interests and global competition.

Two other Change to Win Coalition unions signaled their intentions to leave the AFL-CIO: United Food and Commercial Workers and UNITE HERE, a group of textile and hotel workers. But they were not scheduled to take part in Monday's news conference, said the officials who declined to be named because they were not authorized to discuss the developments prior to the news conference.

bill from jc said...

Yep, that is right up there with the Ast White House Chief of Staff giving out the names of CIA agents to his reporter buddies. I can see how you would get worked up over union troubles and feel it is more important than perjury by White House staffers. So anon, what is your take on this? Should Rove be frog marched from the White House or not? A simple yes or no answer will do.

Anonymous said...

Rove? Frog marched? For what?

bill from jc said...

Perjury.

Anonymous said...

Has he been charged? Indicted? Found guilty? Besides, precedent says that perjury is not a crime at the White House.

bill from jc said...

hehehe.... you know what he did. You can keep making excuses, but you know he sold out his country.... hehehe, I guess we know what patriotism is to people like you. hehehe, you have shown yourselves for what you are. Traitors.

hmmmm said...

It has only been a precedence recently, under the Bush White House (Clinton perjury in Monica affair...)and should not be condoned, especially when the life of an undercover agent, and his/her contacts, are at risk (the reason for the law...) Hopefully someone will take it to court and nail his tail to the wall!

Anonymous said...

Charges? Indictments? Prosecutions? Found guilty?
Don't get mad, get even. Beat 'em at the voting booth. Oh, yeah, you can't. hehehe. What a bunch of pathetic losers.

PS What are we going to do about Joe Willson providing false and misleading information for partisan political purposes?

bill from jc said...

hehehe,, false and misleading information from Joe Wilson? hehe,, What? that Iraq was not seeking uranium from Niger and that Bush lied about it? What is false or misleading about that? teehehehehehe,,,

Rove being frog marched in cuffs, lol now that is funny stuff!

Steve said...

Bill. I didn't make any comment on unemployment. Simple math says you count the number of people working in jobs to get the number of jobs. You don't count the number of people who don't have jobs, chronically or not to arrive at the jobs figure. Link below has the numbers

http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?request_action=wh&graph_name=CE_cesbref1

apm said...

"Charges? Indictments? Prosecutions? Found guilty?"

Perhaps in the near future...


http://www.time.com/time/archive/preview/0,10987,1083899,00.html

That's a link to Matthew Cooper's "What I Told the Grand Jury". Based upon the line of questioning, Cooper's got an opinion as to where Fitzgerald is taking this.

It is my personal opinion that regardless of what may be found, Rove (et. al) will be protected by the administration at all costs.

Anonymous said...

Turns out that Wilson failed to report that Iraq attempted to purchase nuclear material. He only reported that Iraq did not actually purchase any material. Significant difference.

Thanks for the article, apm. In Cooper's own words:
"So did Rove leak Plame's name to me, or tell me she was covert? No."

Some crime, you stupid liberal hick.

Steve, please, stop teasing toothless liberal inmates here with facts. It only pisses them off.

apm said...

"Some crime, you stupid liberal hick."

Who, me?

Anonymous said...

Of course not. The only stupid liberal hick on this blog is billshit, the toothless Tennessean.

Steve said...

Now I will comment on yours re: unemployment. Everything you said about how the unemployment rate is calculated is wrong. The following is a quote from the BLS.

>Some people think that to get these figures on unemployment the Government uses the number of persons filing claims for unemployment insurance (UI) benefits under State or Federal Government programs. But some people are still jobless when their benefits run out, and many more are not eligible at all or delay or never apply for benefits. So, quite clearly, UI information cannot be used as a source for complete information on the number of unemployed. <

I guess >some people< is you Bill.

Link to entire explanation.

http://www.bls.gov/cps/cps_htgm.htm

bill from jc said...

Wow Steve, thanks for repeating what I already said. Odd that you left out that the jobs figures are meaningless unless adjusted for growth in the work force,,, wonder why you left out that inconvienent fact? Could be because when it is considered this president looks even worse. Btw, you might want to check your fonts, your " keeps showing up as > and <.

However wrong, I applaud your use of logic and reason in defending your position. It is nice to have a thoughtful conservative around. I am curious though, how do you feel about being identified with someone loaded only on bile and slander, who is too chickenshit to state thier name?

As to you Anon, you still haven't answered my question (you keep trying to change the subject again, as usual.) Should Rove be frog marched from the White House, yes or no?

Steve said...

Bill, Missed where I'm repeating what you said. I don't recall repeating any of your nonsense. What I said was that more Americans are working today than any time in history. You disputed that with bullshit faux-facts. Give us the links to support your numbers. I've provided the facts to support my case. Where are yours? Show us links to the total work force numbers minus the currently employed equals 3 million lost jobs.

At best your argument is 3 million jobs not created but my guess is you have nothing to support that either.

Another link that shows you don't know what you're talking about.

http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?request_action=wh&graph_name=LN_cpsbref2

Anonymous said...

Hey, billshit, not only are there more Americans working today than anytime in history, there are more Mexicans working in America than anytime in history! There were over 9 million unaccounted for W2's this year. Fucking American capitalism and the Bushh economy is awesome! Now if you liberals will let the blacks off the reservation, we'd really cook!
You fucking liberal pukes are worse than al qaida. Livin' in Liberal Losersville.

bill from jc said...

Yep, you would really cook. Flippin' burgers is the only job you right wingers can create. Cook away anon (as soon as you turn 16 of course!)

bill from jc said...

Btw Steve, the chart you linked to shows that there were less unemployed people when Clinton was in office.


Dumbass.

Anonymous said...

We just love the way you liberals demean hard working people by telling them their work is inconsequential and not worthy. Class warfare is your stock in trade. You would prefer that they draw a check from the state? Of course! Gotta keep those failed liberal social programs propped-up, don't we? And what would we do without all those crackheads on the street corner you liberals created?
So, billshit, what do you do for a living that's soooooo important?

ACG said...

Anonymous, the social value of the job isn't the issue here. Flipping burgers is actually crucial to the fast-food industry, which would collapse without burger flippers. Cleaning up an elementary school hallway, while not terribly sexy. is crucial to the running of the elementary school. The problem is that burger-flipping and hallway-cleaning don't put you above the poverty level. People aren't able to maintain a reasonable standard of living, not necessarily a Hummer standard but a healthy-food-and-a-fan-during-the-summer standard, on the minimum wage paychecks provided by food service or janitorial work. So when the government says it's created a bazillion jobs, but people need three of them just to put food on their families, yes, I question.

Anonymous said...

So, what's wrong with working one, two or three jobs at a time? My wife worked three jobs and took classes all at the same time. When she got through with school, she started her new career. My sister worked three jobs so that her kids didn't have to go to putrid public schools. The point is, there are no bad jobs as long as they're legal.

If you are poor in America, you've made some bad choices that got you there or are keeping you there. Any job puts money in your pocket. With it, you can buy an education or you can go buy yourself some new rims. And, I don't buy your liberal "less fortunate" bullshit. Yes, you can be born into a welfare mom situation created by failed liberal programs BUT you don't have to stay there. Unless you want to admit that after you liberal buffoons have spent trillions of dollars, you have lost the war on poverty?

That's a good question for you liberal idiots: Why is there poverty in America after all the trillions that have been spent on liberal social programs?

WHY? WHY? WHY?

Steve said...

Bill, I know it shows that. I'm not hiding from any facts. It also shows that the employment numbers take into account population growth. That's why the unemployment rate is 5% today and it was 5.6% in 1995 even though the actual number of unemployed was essentially the same. Dumbass.

Ok, We've now moved from lossing jobs to "well the jobs created are low paying crappy jobs". Any stats to back that one up or more faux-facts?

Steve said...

Wages have outpaced inflation the last 4 years. One of things you could infer from that is that the jobs being created are actually paying better than the jobs that were lost.

Anonymous said...

Boy, steve, you've done it now. More facts are just gonna piss-off this toothless liberal bobblehead and his chief enabler, acg.

bill from jc said...

Nope, wrong again Steve. The graph and chart show higher unemployment now than when Clinton was in office and it does not even indicate a constant standard of measurement. Nice try, enjoy the home version of our game.

Anon, do you really sit on your ass fucking around on the internet while your wife works 3 jobs? What kind of a lazy piece of shit are you? Your description keeps getting longer, lazy yellow coward.

Anonymous said...

So, billshit, what do you do for a living? Embarrassed to tell us? Flip burgers? Collect shopping carts from the parking lot?

Anonymous said...

LIBERAL FAILURE ALERT!!!!

Continuing coverage of the great liberal implosion...this just in:

Saturday, July 23, 2005 12:03 a.m. EDT

GITMO TROOPS REBUKE TED KENNEDY

During his inspection tour of Guantanamo Bay this week, Massachusetts Senator Ted Kennedy got an earful from U.S. troops running the facility, who blasted Kennedy for his anti-war statements and similar comments by other Democrats.

Soldiers from Kennedy's home state gave him "a piece of their mind," Pentagon officials told Bill Gertz and Rowan Scarborough of the Washington Times.

One official said that Kennedy "got a stiff reaction from those home-state soldiers. ... The troops down there expressed their disdain for that kind of commentary, especially comparisons to the gulag."

Hawaii Democrat Daniel Akaka, who visited Gitmo along with Kennedy, reportedly got a similar reaction.

This is what our troops in action think of you liberal butt nuggets and your traiterous rhetoric. You turds say you have friends in the military and they "like" you? They hate your fucking guts behind your spineless, stinkin' backs. One exception, they just feel sorry for billshit, being retarded and all that.

bill from jc said...

And you presume to be able to speak for them because you are a lazy yellow coward? i dare say our troops have better spokespersons than you Anon. You aren't fit to polish thier boots.

Wonder where you got that cite from Anon, some right wing site like Newsmax? It's nice that you consider moonie owned newspapers as credible.

Btw shithead, I state what I do for a living as soon as you state what name your mommy gave you.... it's not Steve by chance is it? I can't imagine she named you something obvious like lazy yellow coward.

Anonymous said...

Well, billshit, that response was a real thing of beauty. If the news comes from kung fu monkey or practically harmless or moveon.org, it happened. But if it's reported by the Washington Times, it definitely didn't happen. You really are a pathetic specimen of the liberal species.
You're dismissed. Run back to Ann now.

bill from jc said...

So you do support the moonies! Did you and your overworked wife get married at one of the rev. Sun Young Moon's mass weddings?? It must have been really romantic, how did she get time off work to attend? Yep, what passes for truth to a republican is pretty amazing...

Btw yellow lazy coward, exactly when did I cite Kung fu Monkey or Moveon? Where? When? Show me one time I cited either. Go ahead Mr. Wimpy, Show the world where I cited either of those, or shut the fuck up as an exposed liar.

Steve said...

Bill, Point to the numbers to back up your statements. I'll give you mine.

June of 1995 there were 7,427,000 unemployed and the unemployment rate was 5.6%

June of 2005 there was 7,486,000 unemployed and the unemployment rate is 5.0%

If you just do a little reverse math that means the total workforce, employed plus unemployed, was approx 132M in June of 1995 and it is 149M now. Those numbers are pretty close to what BLS is reporting (+/- million).

Show some real facts to back up words.

Anonymous said...

billshit, you've got to be the biggest rube in blogland. Even your fellow socialists are sick of sticking up for you, they won't even waste their time telling you to "shut the fuck up."
So, here you are, swingin' in the wind, holding your johnson in one hand and your HP financial calculator in the other - and you don't know how to use either one.

apm said...

All of this homoerotic innuendo is really entertaining.
_____________________________________
And Steve - I've only been peaking in here for a short amount of time, and while (I should point out) I am not of the same polictical party as you, I'd like to say that your posts are informative, and your civility is to be commended.

apm said...

I meant to say peeking...sheesh.

bill from jc said...

Yep, anon spends way too much time thinking about my johnson.

Anonymous said...

apm? Another one of billshit's self-serving pseudonyms. Except this personality follows-up to correct his ignorant liberal illiteracy. What a goober...sheesh.

Bill from jc said...

Unlike some folks I have never been so cowardly as to hide my name. Sure, some folks are so chickenshit that they go by "Anonymous" here, but unlike them I have the courage to sign my posts. I don't put them down for hiding, obviously they fear the exposure that thier idiocy would bring.

In any event, if I were to use a pseudonym, do you really think I would use it to pat Steve on the back? Dumbass.

apm said...

Errr, "apm" are my initials. Maybe one day, I'll be trusting enough to also provide my mother's maiden name and my social security number, but until then, my initials will do fine.

I've been reading this blog ever since a friend of mine suggested it. Since I too live in B'ham, he thought I'd enjoy it. I've only left three comments, and already I'm "a goober",and a man from Tennesee (lmao at that one). Jesus Christ, get the fuck over yourselves!

Sheesh...what a laugh.

bill from jc said...

Forgive his rudeness APM, anon's idiocy knows no bounds. Anytime someone new posts anything he thinks it is me changing my name. He personifies his cowardice onto others.

Anonymous said...

Cowardly? C'mon billshit, you won't even tell us what you do for a living. Here, I'll even get it going...I work for a technology company as a pilot. See? Didn't hurt a bit. Now, what's your trade? C'mon now, let's all be civil.

bill from jc said...

Your name. I did not ask or care about your job. I rather doubt anyone would hire you anyway. You name, then you will have taken the first step away from cowardice. As to you being a pilot, I rather doubt a pilot's wife would have to work 3 jobs to make ends meet, unless her husband was not supporting the family of course.

Bill from jc said...

Another good step away from cowardice would be for you to join the military to fight the war you support. If you are really a pilot I bet they could use you now! And the pay will be so good your wife can stop working 3 jobs! hehehehe.....

Anonymous said...

I prefer to fight the good fight against liberal traitors like yourself and Jane Fonda. After all, liberal pukes like y'all are much more dangerous to America than any Islamist militants have been or ever will be. And, a little decompression event blew out my eardrum.

The wife worked the three jobs for about 6 months after we were married.

Interestingly, my name is Bill too. Funny, huh?

Now, it's your turn. Since you don't care to tell us what you do for a living, what does your partner do?

Steve said...

Bill, Since you haven't directly addressed any of the facts I've put forward, we can all assume you are admitting they are true and will stop spitting out what can only be called lies at this point.

And Jesus, God, Budda, Mohammed, Kali... Anon will you shut the fuck up, please!

Bill from jc said...

Check that page again there Steve, it reads a total change of 1.6% since the Bush era high of unemployment. That means that of every 100 people on average that were unemployed last summer, almost 2 of them have found jobs. You can check it on the site you posted, the US Dept of Labor. Again, that does not take into account those who simply gave up. So at best unemployment in this country has flatlined. If the work force has expanded since the Bush era low as you indicate, that means that this increase in jobs you report is illusory at best. And that if you accept the figures provided by the US Dept of Labor, an agency whose head is a Bush appointee. I think we all know how far you can trust those guys with the truth.

And don't tell Anon to shut up, he makes the rest of us look like fucking Eisteins!

Anonymous said...

Thank you, billshit! You definitely sound like an Eistein. Goober Eistein? Sounds good to me.

So, Eistein, why would anyone want to get a job as long as they have your failed liberal social programs to sustain them?

Anonymous said...

steve, you're welcome to play patty cake with these liberal pubes if you want. You will find, eventually, that you can't talk sense or facts to them. In the meantime, mind your own business and stay outta my way.

Steve said...

Bill, I may at some point decide to check your figures and currently accept none of your conclusions based on your history. In the mean time quit spitting "3 million jobs lost" from your piehole because it it a flat out lie.

bill from jc said...

I currently accept none of the Bushie's figures based on thier history, including your obviously slanted employment report. Anyone that beleives anything the Bushites say has to be a gullible maroon.

Anonymous said...

A lesson for the liberalistas...

Here's an educated critique on you socialists and your feel good programs:

Economist Blames Aid for Africa Famine
By TODD PITMAN, Associated Press Writer
Sun Jul 31, 5:12 AM ET

DAKAR, Senegal - In Niger, a desert country twice the size of Texas, most of the 11 million people live on a dollar a day. Forty percent of children are underfed, and one out of four dies before turning 5. And that's when things are normal. Throw in a plague of locusts, and a familiar spectacle emerges: skeletal babies, distended bellies, people too famished to brush the flies from their faces.

To the aid workers charged with saving the dying, the immediate challenge is to raise relief money and get supplies to the stricken areas. They leave it to the economists and politicians to come up with a lasting remedy. One such economist is James Shikwati. He blames foreign aid.

"When aid money keeps coming, all our policy-makers do is strategize on how to get more," said the Kenya-based director of the Inter Region Economic Network, an African think tank.

"They forget about getting their own people working to solve these very basic problems. In Africa, we look to outsiders to solve our problems, making the victim not take responsibility to change."

Translation for you liberal dimwits:
Personal responsibility and capitalism is the answer. Not your failed great society handouts. Build a big economy, not a big government!

bill from jc said...

So our little conservative Nincompoop would now like us to withdraw aid from Iraq, stop building a government there, and stop giving uncapitolistic unbid contracts to Haliburton?

Have you ever considered thinking before your write?

Dumbass.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, I thought about, Eistein. We're building a democracy in Iraq. You and your fellow liberal socialists are building a welfare state in Africa. Think about it, goober.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, I thought about it, Eistein. We're building a democracy in Iraq. You and your fellow liberal socialists are building a welfare state in Africa. Think about it, goober.

Steve said...

Bill, Can't think of anything that would make you look like Einstein unless you have a really bushy mustache and bad hair.

Bill from jc said...

We are spending alot more in Iraq than in all of Africa, building a big government there, and being uncapitolistic by handing out contracts without competition. 'nuff said. For you to be in favor of that would be intellectually dishonest.... not that honesty is something one would expect from a republican.

As to me looking like Einstein, how about that he stood up to conservative facists too?

Anonymous said...

Hey, Eistein, you are correct! We are building a big democratic government in Iraq. You leftist pukes oughta love it! Or, are you saying let's revert to SH's oppressive dictatorship?
Tell you what, goober, you liberal fucksticks take Africa and implement your failed socialist systems, we'll take Iraq and apply capitalism. In 10 years we'll see whose better off. I can see it now...pimps and crack ho's hangin' out at the local jungle water pump. The local liberal mayor runnin' for office, his slogan: A bone and a straw in every nose. Meanwhile back in Baghdad, Bill Gates, after giving up on throwing good money after bad at failed African relief programs, is cutting the ribbon on a new Microsoft software development center supporting 300 new software developers. You pukes are nothing but a bunch of sorry losers. Wadda ya think of our new UN ambassador? How did you put it? Oh, yeah, heehee. Pussy.

bill from jc said...

I always figured you for a fan of big govenment Anon. I note you did not offer a defense of anti capitolistic non competitive no bid contracts for Haliburton, I suppose there really is no defense for that sort of thing, unless you are one of those "The Fountainhead" over rules "The Bible" types.

As to Bolton, I think it says alot that the Liar in Cheif did not think he had the votes to get him confirmed in the republican controlled Senate,

And I figure Pakistan is alot better place for MS to open a software development lab, don't you? Unless you figure he can get a Haliburton styled no bid contract to do it somewhere else.

As to your stereotyping of Africans, you are one bigoted imbecile.

Anonymous said...

Goober, you've got to be the most illiterate moron that ever blogged. You are the poster boy for another failed liberal program, the public school system.

Bill from jc said...

Maybe, but at least I didn't just put down the entire population of a continent with myopic racial stereotypes like an inbred banjo playing klucker.

Anonymous said...

No maybe about it. You're an illiterate buttsqueeze.
Don't forget to take Rainbow Coalition Jesse and PUSH with you when you leave for the heart of darkness. If he does for Africans what he's done for black Americans, he'll make another fortune off you liberal idiots. And, puuuuhleeez, don't forget Coretta Scott K'ching either.
You all can't wait. Millions to exploit, again. Fresh meat for the liberal do-gooders. Some how, in your own twisted minds, one of you liberalistas is hoping you can qualify Africans for absentee balloting back here in the good ole' US of A. Hell, you turds can't see a "less fortunate" victim without thinking of converting their plight to votes.
Hey, I don't want to offend you liberal PC-obsessed idiots. Do you call them Africans or African Africans?
What a bunch of losers. Liberals from Losersville.

ACG said...

We are, Anonymous. We are losers from Loserville, and how clever of you to point that out. We're so loserish, in fact, that perhaps it's best that you not spend a lot of time around us, lest our loserishness rub off on you and reduce you to sophomoric name-calling and baseless accusations. Door's that way.

Anonymous said...

Acceptance that you're a liberal loser is the first step, baby sis. You're now on your way to a whole new life. One of optimism, hope and prosperity realized. Don't be afraid, cast that Catholic guilt and liberal pathology aside and enjoy life in America. Speak of the good life that freedom and capitalism can bring. Tell the "less fortunate" to put down their crack pipes, don't buy those rims, get off the pole and get an education, a job. Show them the way to the promised land of Dow Jones. Tell them not to listen to those who would make excuses for them and keep them bound to their despair.
C'mon in boys and girls, the water's just fine in Winnersville.

Anonymous said...

Thanks for showing me the door, baby sis. But, as Father Damien said, "if you're gonna cure leprosy, you gotta hang with the lepers."

capers said...

This guy is a hoot! How'd you folks let this one in your house?

Anonymous said...

Hey, Eistein, that Bolton thing? When you're the WINNER you get to tell the obstructionist liberal hacks like Teddy K and Hairyass Reid to stick it up their butts.

bill from jc said...

And apparently you get to hurl racial slurs at an entire continent then wonder why folks of that race don't want to vote for your canidates. I rather hang with the righteous liberals than the hypocrite conservatives any day. Plus, the throw better parties. (and have prettier girls)

Anonymous said...

Prettier girls? Like this toad?

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/03/16/whitehouse.willey/ann.lewis.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/03/16/whitehouse.willey/&h=162&w=162&sz=9&tbnid=AOFdTAHVPnUJ:&tbnh=92&tbnw=92&hl=en&start=1&prev=/images%3Fq%3D%2522ann%2Blewis%2522%2Bclinton%2B%26svnum%3D50%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26safe%3Doff%26rls%3DGGLD,GGLD:2005-18,GGLD:en

Gag a maggot.

Anonymous said...

Hey, Eistein, I could hurl slurs all day, night, week, month and year long but with one stroke of LBJ's pen he did more damage with his great society liberal bullshit to the entire black American culture than I ever could. You buttwipes doomed blacks to poverty. You shameless nimrods.
Hey, goober, who's had more blacks in their cabinet than any other US president? Hurts to admit it, don't it? You liberal dickweeds keep 'em in the ghetto exchanging their votes for welfare checks. We make 'em Secretaries of State. Two in a row! You call 'em Osama Obama. What a bunch of liberal racists. You dumb toothless hick.

Anonymous said...

I see that Dougie hasn't done another question for conservatives.

I guess you gutless liberal wonders hate getting you asses kicked all day long.

bill from jc said...

Let's see, LBJ signed the Civil Rights Act, and our resident conservative now thinks that was a bad idea... wow, there's a surprise.

And anon, 3 posts up is an excellent conundrum for you to figure out, yet you have ignored if for a week now.... Whats the matter? Does being asked to serve your country make you squimish?

Anonymous said...

Eistein, LBJ signed the Civil Rights Act that was passed with the help of conservative Republicans. What a nimrod!